There is no more important place for the rule of law to be felt with all of its wrath and fury, than upon the backs of the federal judiciary, who have been deliberately and willfully ruling [against the rules of the Court] outside of the law and outside of their limited and delegated authority under the Constitution.

The beginning of the end of this Republic can be directly traced back to the sophistry [fallacious reasoning, sound in appearance only] of the federal court system. Judges who have placed their own opinions above law (and the "rule of law") are by far the most sophisticated, insidious and vicious enemies of our Republican form of government (as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution) and of the Constitution itself. Any reasonable [and honest] scholar of the Founders and Framers is well aware of the dangers inherent in an out-of-control judicial branch. One of the chief concerns voiced in the Declaration was with regard to His Majesty's judiciary: "He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries..."

A society that does not have safeguards in place, against the corruption of its judiciary, will eventually live under tyranny. Our supreme Court should know no monarch but the Constitution of the United States, through which it receives its delegated and limited powers from We The People.

In case after case (beginning early in the last century) judges have been handing down rulings (according to their own agendas) rather than in strict adherence to the law in its original intent.

Law schools no longer teach Constitutional law (or even statutory law) but engage themselves in the same collusion by obscuring the law in favor of the opinions of courts and judges for the written law. This constitutes blatant disregard for the original intent of the Congress. [Collusion: "An agreement between two or more persons to defraud a person of his rights by the forms of law, or to obtain an object forbidden by law. It implies the existence of fraud of some kind, the employment of fraudulent means, or of lawful means for the accomplishment of an unlawful purpose. Tomiyosu v. Golden, 81 Nev. 140, 400 P.2d 415, 417. A secret combination, conspiracy, or concert of action between two or more persons for fraudulent or deceitful purpose. See CONSPIRACY..." - Black's Law, Sixth Edition]

The Constitution is no longer welcome in our Courts of Law. Every effort is made to keep juries from knowing their lawful responsibilities, and in many cases - the rules of the court are disposed of when the outcome must be predetermined to fit the agenda of the judge, the court or some overbearing government agency.

Lately, we have seen examples of judges who, for all intents and purposes, act as additional government attorneys. They violate the rules and "step in" as either defense attorneys or prosecutors for the government. When the government's case appears to be jeopardized because the government has operated under color of law, outside of its lawful authority, or - in some cases, the government attorneys or "expert witnesses" are grossly incompetent and/or ill-prepared, these judges step over the line.

All judges - and particularly those in the federal judiciary - must be brought to justice one way or another. If this cannot be done, the Republic will be lost. What could possibly make more sense than to require that the rule of law must rule over the judiciary with a force equal to that with which it must rule over all citizens? If the judges do not fear God, they must be made to fear the retribution of the American people. Judges are to remain in office "during good behavior," but who is to evaluate their performance? Clearly this is a matter that can no longer be left to other judges.

The text from the State of New York that accompanied the document ratifying the U.S. Constitution included words of concern and recommendations that may seem prophetic if we were to consider the obvious: that the judiciary may have needed more constraints from the beginning. They read as follows:

"That persons aggrieved by any Judgment, Sentence or Decree of the Supreme Court of the United States, in any Cause in which that Court has original Jurisdiction, with such exceptions and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make concerning the same, shall upon application, have a Commission to be issued by the President of the United States, to such Men learned in Law as he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and consent of the Senate appoint not less than seven, authorizing such Commissioners, or any seven or more of them, to correct the Errors in such Judgment or to review such Sentence and Decree, as the case may be, and to do Justice to the parties in the Premises."

To this most necessary end - that of forcing judges to obey and apply the law according to the original intent of the legislator - we are introducing a proposed law [see Appendix, two laws are proposed-one federal, one state] that would go a long way toward eliminating the tyranny now being enacted under the "color of law" by our federal [or state] judiciary. We anticipate that once prosecutions have commenced, those judges who have some hope of remaining whole (and in office) will be anxious to obey both the letter and the spirit of the law. America clearly has no other choice in this matter. If we are to survive under our Constitution, the "laws made in pursuance thereof" must be obeyed and applied according to the intent of the legislator and not the whim, sophistry or collusion of the judges. There can be no government of separate and distinct powers as long as judges' rulings can have the effect of "making" law. "Case-Law is only binding upon the litigants!"

As always, the first line of attack must be the thorough education of all the people. Ultimately, it is the people [who have become fit for nothing but slavery] that are responsible for their own condition. If someone is now experiencing pain, it behooves them to search for the causes until they find and understand "the first cause." In order for this to be accomplished, the people must be made to understand all of their responsibilities as Sovereigns.

This goes hand in hand with the realization that the "government" is now operating far outside of the law. Our limited government is now functioning as if it were an absolute oligarchy or an aristocracy. A certain class (or group of classes) have (at least tacitly) agreed to attempt the total domination of the rest of us, entirely without the support of laws enacted in pursuance of our Constitution. An "end-run" around the Constitution is well underway.

The Constitution is of course under new attacks by the same collection of groups that are still lobbying for a Constitutional Convention. Now as they lick their wounds from the backlash created at the grassroots in the last couple of States they needed - and failed to capture - they have initiated a new and unlawful compact between representatives of the States, which is yet another attempt to gut or emasculate the Constitution.

One of the questions being asked of late during the qualification of juries [which are being carefully orchestrated to obtain predictable results]: "Have you ever been affiliated with the "Fully Informed Jury Association?" The selection of juries is being more and more carefully orchestrated to obtain predictable results. It would seem that the judges and lawyers are unified on at least this point: They would rather work their "magic" with uninformed jurors. This alone should provide quite enough motivation for all citizens to educate themselves concerning all of the information that these groups would have withheld from us. [Ed Note: The Fully Informed Jury Association or F.I.J.A. 1-800-TEL-JURY (835-5879.]

When juries understand their responsibilities and the scope of their authority, the judges will be placed in a position of having to hold to the strict application of the law and the rules, without having any recourse to the tactics of jury rigging, sophistry and deception, now so prominent in the courts.

However far the above measures may take us, they cannot go far enough in satisfying justice with regard to the volumes of unlawful rulings, jury deception, and legion violations of Constitutional Rights, due process and the rules of procedure. These have violated, injured and abused perhaps millions of innocent American citizens. The judiciary must be made subject not only to review, but also to the heaviest sentences, fines, imprisonment and loss of all retirement benefits, when it is ascertained that they have - in fact, and willfully - issued rulings contrary to the facts, the law, or both, in any case.

We [SAP Fellowship] are not yet involved in any "grassroots" effort to promote this new law [LEADERS thinks it is a GREAT idea-hence this introduction for state and local legislators], but would be interested in input from those who will take an interest in its promotion and passage through Congress and the legislatures of the several States. If you can identify a potential sponsor at the state or Federal level, you are encouraged to copy the appropriate text from the proposed laws [see Appendix] for the purpose of introducing these bills to legislators. If we can be of any assistance in explaining this approach to your legislators, please have them contact us as soon as possible.